Editing video task and learner responses

-
Editing video task and learner responses

Mr Halsey:
MOA: 1/2
SRS: Done
180°: Broken once

  • Great location, nice acting and script- if works perfectly as a one minute film. Entertaining.
  • Match-on-action not used as much as it could have been ( sitting down, phone shots all opportunities to use it)
  • Camera switches sides once ( from long shot of both to over the shoulder) but the observes 180° rule well.
  • Needed more cuts back and forth during the conversation ( reaction shots e.g)
Reflection on my work:

WWW: Made it entertaining and the shot reverse shot was done perfectly

EBI: Make sure the 180 degree rule isn’t broken and the use more of match in action. Spend more time on editing so that it’s looks like continuous editing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Field In England & Arthouse cinema - concluded

-
Comments Media Magazine: The Appeal of Arthouse Cinema 1) Summarise the article in 50 words. This article explores what is meant by an Arthouse cinema. It proceeds to describe it as artistic rather than commercial in character. This typically means that the film has a low budget and is likely to be difficult to understand or 'read'. 2) What are some of the suggested audience pleasures for arthouse film? Some aspects which audiences that watch arthouse films tend to enjoy films which are hard to understand or highlight certain aspects of society which get ignored or neglected. 3) Why do some audiences struggle with arthouse film? Refer to some media  theory  here (there are some important media theories discussed in the article itself). Some audiences may struggle to watch arthouse film as it doesn't follow Todorov's theory of equilibrium which is what most audiences tend to enjoy as it maintains attentionspan with quick and short cutting scenes which have a basic st...
Read more

Chicken case study research

-
Sources:  Film News interview with director Joe Stephenson Hey Guys interview with Stephenson Flavourmag interview with Scott Chambers and Joe Stephenson trailer for Chicken Into Film feature on Chicken important film critic Mark Kermode's review of Chicken on the BBC Funding 1) What was the budget for Chicken?  £110,000  2) How did Joe Stephenson end up raising the money to make the film?  He got the money from loans from his wealthy friends. 3) How does the Chicken budget compare to a Hollywood-funded British blockbuster such as Spectre or Paddington 2?  The budget for Spectre was $245-250 million and the budget for Paddington 2 was $50-55 million. Compared to the chicken budget of £100k, the other two movies had an enormously larger budget.  4) Joe Stephenson tried to secure funding from organisations that help low-budget filmmakers. What is the  BFI Film Fund  and how does it contribute to the British film industry?  The B...
Read more

British Film Industry Factsheet

-
Factsheet #132: British Film 1) Write a one-sentence definition of what makes a film British. A British film needs to meet specific criteria such as: Having a British directors, producers, actors and being filmed in Britain. 2) What is the difference between a Hollywood production context and production context of a British film? For instance the Hollywood production context means that most films made by Hollywood studios have high budgets, a heavy reliance on celebrities both in the cast and crew and spectacle driven stories. Whereas the independent production context films tend to have low budgets, character rather than spectacle driven stories and a heavier reliance on word of mouth and viral advertising. 3) When did the James Bond franchise start? 1962 4) In terms of film censorship and graphic content, what began to change in British film in the 1970s and 1980s? The 1970s sees a rise in British Films of sexual content, both the act of sex and...
Read more